MD. JURAN ALI AHMED AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS
WP(C)/2614/2024 · 2026-04-01
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1995 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1995 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010089622024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2614/2024 MD. JURAN ALI AHMED AND ANR S/O- HAZI TAZUDDIN, R/O A K AZAD PATH, SHAHNAGAR, HATIGAON, GUWAHATI, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781038.
2: NURUL ISLAM S/O- LATE HAKIM ALI
R/O- KAHILIPARA JANAKPUR
NEAR JOURNALISH COLONY
GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP(M)
ASSAM PIN- 781019 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, FOREST AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE ARANYA BHAWAN PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 781037.
Page No.# 2/3 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
6:THE JOINT DIRECTOR TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM MINES AND MINERALS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006.
7:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER
UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI- 781001.
8:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (GMDA) REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
BHANGAGARH ASSAM GUWAHATI- 781005 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S A AHMED, C S KAMTHONG,A. KHANAM,MR. F A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS,GA, ASSAM,SC, G M D A,SC, GMC
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 02-04-2026 Mr. S.A. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition. Mr. K. Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant