Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1994 (GAU)

MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA v. STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/408/2024 · 2026-02-26

Kaushik Goswami, Michael Zothankhuma

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010067782024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/408/2024 MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O ABIDUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA VILL.- DHONEHARI PT. I P.S.- SONAI DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P. ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR D TALUKDAR Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for STATE OF ASSAM Linked Case : Crl.A./122/2024 MOKLISH AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O ABIDUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA, VILL.- DHONEHARI PT. I, P.S.- SONAI, DIST.- CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY P.P., ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D TALUKDAR, MR. P DAIMARY,MR. R. KARIM,J MEDHI,MS. N M LONGKENG,MS P SAIKIA,MR P CHOUDHURY,MR. K MOHAMMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 27.02.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Mr. P.K. Deka, learned counsel appears for the applicant-appellant, while Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Sr. Counsel and Addl. P.P. appears for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 389(2) of Cr.P.C. for suspending the sentence inflicted upon the applicant-appellant pursuant to the Judgment dated 24.01.2024 and sentence order dated 30.01.2024, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Cachar, Silchar in Sessions Case No.103/2016, convicting the applicant-appellant under Section 302 of IPC. 3. On a perusal of the evidence, it appears that there are eye witnesses to the incident implicating the applicant-appellant. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that in view of the paper book having been furnished to him and to the learned Addl. P.P., the matter can be listed for hearing and he would not like to press this application under Section 389(2) of Cr.P.C. 5. On account of the submission made by the learned counsel for the Page No.# 3/3 applicant-appellant, the I.A. stands dismissed as not pressed. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant