Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1992 (AP)

Pasupala Umen, v. Union of India,

WP(PIL)/106/2024 · 2026-08-18

Challa Gunaranjan, Lisa Gill

Public Interest Litigationbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010210742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WP(PIL) NO: 106 of 2024 Bench Sr.No:-12 [3584] Pasupala Umen and others ...Petitioners Vs. Union of India and others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 19th August, 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner : Ms Karuna Chowdary for Mr Jada Sravan Kumar Advocate(s) for Respondent(s) : Mr T. Niranjan (Deputy Solicitor General of India) – R.1, Mr Bolla Venkata Rama Rao [SC for APPCB] – R.2 & R.3, Mr K. Raji Reddy, Senior Counsel with Mr Venkatram Reddy Mantur – R.8 & R.9. LISA GILL, CJ: Grievance raised in this writ petition filed by way of public interest was in respect to failure on the part of respondent No.8 to transport limestone in accordance with terms and conditions of environment clearance as well as pollution control norms. 2. Learned counsel for respondents had pointed out that operations as on today are being carried out in complete compliance of applicable rules 2 HCJ & CGR, J WP(PIL)_106_2024 and norms. It is further stated that exemption from setting up the conveyor belt has been afforded by Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change on 25.01.2026; thus it is reiterated that operations are being carried out in complete compliance of applicable provisions. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners does not deny the same and states that proceedings may thus be closed. 4. Ordered accordingly. No costs. Pending application(s) if any stand(s) disposed of accordingly. LISA GILL, CJ CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J Vjl Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable : Yes / No