Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1991 (BOM)

EXECUTIVE ENGINNER MAJALGAON CANAL DIVISION NO 10 PARBHANI UNDER GMIDC AURANGABAD v. GEETABAI LAXMAN GAVHALE AND ORS

CA/7028/2026 · 2026-07-27

Shri Sandipkumar C More, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

114.2024CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 55 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 114 OF 2024 IN WP/9147/2019 GEETABAI W/O LAXMAN GAVHALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Shinde C.K. AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. D.S. Jape Advocate for Respondent no.2 : Mr. B.R. Surwase ... WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7028 OF 2026 IN CP/114/2024 EXECUTIVE ENGINNER MAJALGAON CANAL DIVISION NO 10 PARBHANI UNDER GMIDC AURANGABAD VERSUS GEETABAI LAXMAN GAVHALE AND ORS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B.R.Survase AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. D.S. Jape Advocate for petitioner in CP : Mr. C.K. Shinde ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 27.07.2026 P.C. : 1] Pursuant to the order under contempt, the respondent- acquiring body has deposited 50% of the total compensation amount in this Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner also confirms the said fact. 114.2024CP 2 2] Learned counsel for the respondent-acquiring body further submits that the remaining amount is demanded from the State Government and as and when it is received, the same will be deposited. 3] In view of the same, pending Civil Application no.7028/2026 for permission to deposit the amount has rendered infructuous and it stands disposed of. 4] Stand over to 24.08.2026. 5] The petitioners are allowed to withdraw the already deposited amount by the respondent-acquiring body. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE sga