CRM-M-19932- IN THE H (121) RANJIT SINGH STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. R MANISHA BATR 1. The by the Court of Le of FIR No.156 da IPC (Sections 41 Maqboolpura, Dis forfeited to the S against him for 21 2. It is a before the Learned 10.10.2024, he ha -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH NGH ALIAS RANA ALIAS TOTI A Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Ramnish Puri, Advocate for the p Mr. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner is seeking quashing of t of Learned Additional Sessions Judg 156 dated 01.07.2023 registered unde ons 411 and 201 of IPC added ra, District Amritsar, whereby his bail the State. Now non-bailable warra for 21.04.2026. It is argued by learned counsel for t earned Trial Court was not intentiona he had been arrested in another ca JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-19932-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.04.2026 OTI ALIAS FOGI ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA r the petitioner r DAG, Punjab ing of order dated 02.12.2024 passed s Judge, Amritsar in case arising out d under Section 379B(2) and 34 of dded later on) at Police Station is bail was cancelled and bonds were warrants are ordered to be issued l for the petitioner that his absence ntional but due to the reason that on ther case bearing FIR No.98 dated M) 2026 oner dent ssed g out 4 of ation were sued ence at on ated AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19932- 07.09.2024 registe 338, 336(3), 238, and had been r formalities. There fixed by the Lear Learned Trial Cou upon him. It is, th 3. Notic 4. Learn the Court and arg order. Even after not bother to appe and, therefore, the 5. This C 6. The p 02.12.2024 due t petitioner has plac the Court of Lea bearing FIR No.9 bail in that case o such his absence o However, the pet Court, thereafter, f -2026 (O&M) 2 registered under Sections 304(2) and , 238, 317(2) of BNS and Section 25 een released only on 03.12.2024 Thereafter, he could not come to kn e Learned Trial Court. He is ready ial Court and to abide by the terms a t is, therefore, argued that the petition Notice of motion. Learned State counsel accepts notice nd argued that there is no illegality after the release of the petitioner in a o appear before the Learned Trial Cour re, the petition does not deserve to be a This Court has heard the rival submis The petitioner had not appeared be due to which his bail was cancelle as placed on record a copy of order d f Learned Additional Sessions Judg No.98 dated 07.09.2024 wherein he case only on 27.11.2024 and had be ence on 02.12.2024 before the Learned he petitioner has not bothered to app after, for a period of over one year. ) and 3(5) of BNS (Sections 318(4), ion 25 of Arms Act added later on) .2024 after completing necessary to know about subsequent dates as eady to join proceedings before the erms and conditions to be imposed tition deserves to be allowed. notice of the petition on the asking of gality or infirmity in the impugned er in another case, the petitioner did l Court for over a period of one year to be allowed. ubmissions made by the parties. red before the Learned Trial Court ancelled. Learned counsel for the rder dated 27.11.2024 as passed by s Judge, Amritsar in another case ein he had been extended benefit of ad been released on 03.12.2024, as earned Trial Court stands explained. to appear before the Learned Trial ear. This Court finds no illegality or 8(4), r on) ssary es as e the osed ng of gned r did year ourt r the d by case fit of 4, as ined. Trial ty or AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19932- irregularity in the Court explaining h fact that the petitio Court and is ready by the Trial Cou petitioner to surre today and on doin the satisfaction of of Rs.10,000/- bef he shall be admitte 7. A cop 16.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 3 in the impugned order since no applic ining his absence was moved on his b petitioner is ready to join the proceed ready to abide by the terms and cond l Court, the petition is disposed o surrender before the Trial Court wit n doing so and furnishing fresh perso of Learned Trial Court and further before the District Legal Services dmitted to bail by the Trial Court. A copy of this order be sent to the Le (MA Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable:- Yes/No application before the Learned Trial his behalf, however, in view of the roceedings before the Learned Trial conditions to be imposed upon him sed of by giving direction to the urt within a period of 10 days from personal as well as surety bonds to further on depositing cost to the tune rvices Authority (DLSA), Amritsar, the Learned Trial Court. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No es/No Trial f the Trial him the from ds to tune , AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.