IN TH 126(2 cases) 1. Vikas Dinesh Ku 2. Smt. Bala Dinesh Ku CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU same Awar Claims Tri order. FAO Nos.1016 and 1024 of 2024 (O IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR ases) FAO No.1016 of Date of decision Versus sh Kumar and others FAO No.1024 of Bala and others Versus sh Kumar and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the appellant(s) in bo Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Since both the aforesai Award dated 11.10.2023 passed by t s Tribunal, Karnal, both are being (O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 016 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-04.05.2026 …..Appellant …..Respondents 024 of 2024 (O & M) …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ) in both cases. urance Company. foresaid appeals arise out of the d by the learned Motor Accident eing disposed of by this common VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.05 10.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Vikas, whe seeking en Tribunal vi succumbed (appellant i awarded a who was as ₹21,51,960 minor sons record that behalf of issued. Tod there is no casual app present app in affordin appellants appellants further. dismiss bot FAO Nos.1016 and 1024 of 2024 (O FAO-1016-2024 has been fil s, whereas FAO-1024-2024 has been ing enhancement of the compensatio nal vide Award dated 11.10.2023. As umbed to injuries sustained in a roadsi ellant in FAO-1016-2024) suffered inj ded a sum of ₹1,38,521/- as compens was assessed to have suffered 5% perm 51,960/- was awarded to the claiman r sons and father of the deceased Rahu The appeals pertain to the ye rd that since their institution, none lf of the appellants and even notice d. Today also, when the cases were tak is no representation on behalf of the a The aforesaid conduct reflects al approach on the part of the app nt appeals. Considerable judicial time ffording opportunities in the interest llants have failed to avail the same. llants nor their counsel are interested i In view of the above, this C iss both the appeals for want of prosec Ordered accordingly. (O & M) 2 en filed by the injured/claimant been preferred by the claimants nsation awarded by the learned 23. As per the said Award, Rahul roadside accident, whereas Vikas red injuries. The learned Tribunal mpensation to the injured Vikas, % permanent disability. A sum of laimants, namely the wife, two d Rahul. the year 2024. It is a matter of none has put in appearance on notice of motion has not been ere taken up in the second round, f the appellants. reflects a lack of diligence and a e appellants in prosecuting the l time has already been expended nterest of justice; however, the e. It appears that neither the ested in pursuing the matters any this Court has no option but to prosecution. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.05 10.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document of. connected c May 04, 20 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO Nos.1016 and 1024 of 2024 (O Pending application(s), if any A photocopy of this order be ected case. , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No (O & M) 3 if any, shall also stand disposed der be placed on the file of the ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.05 10.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document