Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1966 (GAU)

DR. KISHORE KUMAR KAMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 40 ORS

WP(C)/6522/2024 · 2026-02-01

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC010259472024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6522/2024 DR. KISHORE KUMAR KAMAN S/O- LATE BHUBAN CHANDRA KAMAN, PRESENT PLACE OF WORKING AND POST- CHIEF MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, O/O-THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, DHEMAJI, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, GOVT. OF ASSAM, NORTH LAKHIMPUR, R/O- VILLAGE- MOHMORA, JONAI, P.O AND P.S- JONAI, DIST- DHEMAJI, ASSAM, PIN-787060 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 40 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 2:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 4:THE SECRETARY Page No.# 2/5 TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PERSONNEL (B) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 5:SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 6:JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 7:COMMISSIONER AND SPL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT FOR HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 8:DR. MANO MOHAN MORAL CM AND HO (CD) KOKRAJHAR O/O THE JDHS 9:DR. HASMAT ALI CM AND HO (CD) BARPETA O/O THE JDHS 10:DR. MUKUNDA RAM BHATTACHARYA ADDL CM AND HO (PH) JORHAT O/O THE ADDL CM AND HO JORHAT 11:DR. KAMAL CH. GOGOI ADDL CM AND HO (FW) HOJAI O/O THE ADDL CM AND HO HOJAI 12:DR. APURBA KRISHNA SARMA Page No.# 3/5 CM AND HO (CD) KAMRUP METRO O/O THE JDHS 13:DR. PRASANTA BORAH DLO KOKRAJHAR ALLOWED TO WORK AT BIDHAN SABHA SANSTHYA KENDRA 14:DR. HARUN AL RASHID SUPDDT. DHUBRI CIVIL HOSPITAL 15:DR. BIKASH RN GOGOI SUPDDT. MANGALDAI CIVIL HOSPITAL 16:DR. ARPANA DUTTA SUPDDT. NORTH LAKHIMPUR CIVIL HOSPITAL 17:DR JAGAT SINGH TERON DLO DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG O/O THE JDHS KARBI ANGLONG 18:DR. ARUP KR. CHOUDHURY CM AND HO (CD) O/O THE JDHS DHUBRI 19:DR. KAMAL DEV GOSWAMI ADDL CM AND HO (FW) KAMRUP METRO 20:DR. BENUDHAR DUARA SUPDDT. TINSUKIA LGB CIVIL HOSPITAL 21:DR. CHIDANANDA THAKURIA SUPDDT. UDALGURI CIVIL HOSPITAL 22:DR. RUPAK KUMAR BARUAH ADDL CM AND HO (FW) SONITPUR 23:DR. PURABI SAIKIA ZLO Page No.# 4/5 KAMRUP METRO O/O THE JDHS 24:DR. KABITA BARUAH ADDL CM AND HO (FW) NAGAON 25:DR. DILLI RAM ADHIKARY CM AND HO (CD) O/O THE JDHS DARRANG 26:DR. SANJOY CHOUDHURY (ENT) ADDL. CM AND HO (FW) GOALPARA 27:DR. BHUPEN CHANDRA BORAH (PATH) SUPDTT. BPCH NAGAON 28:DR. TAMESH CH. TALUKDAR SUPDTT. JSB CIVIL HOSPITAL CHIRANG 29:DR. BHARATI BARKATOKY (RADIO) ADDL. CM AND HO (FW) BARPETA 30:DR. RAJIB RANJAN GOGOI ADDL. CM AND HO (FW) TINSUKIA 31:DR. REJAUL KARIM SUPDTT. JSB CIVIL HOSPITAL CHIRANG 32:DR. ROBIN KR. GOGOI SUPDTT. TINSUKIA CIVIL HOSPITAL 33:DR. BHARAT KR. PHUKAN CM AND HO (CD) JDHS GOLAGHAT 34:DR. SANJEEV KR. SAIKIA ADDL. CM AND HO (CD) JDHS GOLAGHAT 35:DR. DIMBESWAR SARMA Page No.# 5/5 SUPDDTT. MORIGAON CIVIL HOSPITAL 36:DR. MAINUL ISLAM BARBHUYAN ADDL. CM AND HO (CD) JDHS, CACHAR 37:DR. MANAB KR. CHOUDHURY CM AND HO (CD) JDHS NALBARI 38:DR. BINAPANI NEOG CM AND HO (CD) JDHS, NAGAON 39:DR. CHITTARANJAN HAZARIKA SUPDDTT. GOALPARA CIVIL HOSPITAL 40:DR. DILIP PAUL SUPDDTT. HAILAKANDI CIVIL HOSPITAL 41:DR. BISWAJIT BARUAH SUPDDTT. NAHARKATIA SUB DIVISIONAL CIVIL HOSPITA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D K DAS, MR C KUMAR,MR H BETALA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HEALTH, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 02-02-2026 Mr. D.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the reliefs sought for in the present writ petition has been granted by promoting the petitioner. He therefore, prays that this matter no longer needs adjudication. In view of the above, this writ petition is closed as infractuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant