Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1947 (PNJ)

GURSAHIB SINGH v. M/S INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERS AND FABRICATORS PVT. LTD.

CR/1574/2024 · 2026-02-06

Alka Sarin

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

226 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1574-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.02.2026 Gursahib Singh ... Petitioner(s) Versus M/s Industrial Engineers & Fabricators Pvt Ltd ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Ashok Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Salar, Advocate for the respondent. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. On 13.03.2024 the following order was passed : “Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is still pending before the Court wherein the decree-holder has not been served as he is stated to have gone abroad. However, the objections have been dismissed and the execution proceedings are continuing. Notice of motion returnable 26.04.2024. Dasti only. Liberty to serve the respondent through the counsel representing it before the Court concerned. To be shown in the urgent list.” 2. Vide order dated 25.09.2025 the application filed by the petitioner herein for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree has been YOGESH SHARMA 2026.02.07 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh CR-1574-2024 (O&M) 2 dismissed in default. Admittedly, till date no application has been filed for reviving the same. 3. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed at this stage. The present revision petition stands disposed off at this stage. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 06.02.2026 Yogesh Sharma ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO YOGESH SHARMA 2026.02.07 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh