IN TH 101 Bir Singh Sh. Sanjee Bank CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Bench of t titled as “ whereby th of the petit within a pe compliance and other granted to COCP-1638-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1638 o Date of decision ingh Tak Versus anjeev Kumar Dhupar, Chairman AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Y.P. Khullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate wi Ms. Chahat, Advocate and Mr. Aamol Singh, Advocate fo HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of interim order dated 26.2.202 h of this Court in CWP Nos.19948 o as “Bir Singh Tak vs. Sarva Haryana eby the respondent-Bank was directed petitioner alongwith interest @6% a period of two months from today… Learned counsel for the petit liance of the Writ Court order dated 2 other emoluments as payable to the ted to the petitioner. It is submitted th 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1638 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-16.03.2026 …..Petitioner irman, Sarva Haryana Gramin …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ate with cate for the respondent. ition has been filed alleging .2.2024 passed by a co-ordinate 9948 of 2019 and 3251 of 2022 ana Gramin Bank and others”, irected “…to release the gratuity 6% per annum and preferably ay….”. e petitioner submits that in non- ated 26.2.2024 the entire gratuity to the petitioner have not been itted that accordingly only partial VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document compliance respondent compliance and referre Sanjeev K mentioned COCP-1638-2024 (O & M) liance of the Writ Court order ndents. Learned counsel for the res liance of the Writ Court order dated referred to the additional affidavit da eev Kumar Dhupar-respondent in the ioned as follows :- “1. That by th petitioner is claimin allowance for the pu gratuity. However, it is of special allowance cadre for the first time signed between the Association on 25.05.2 with the effect from Annexure R-2. Anothe between both the partie made effective from Annexure R-3. 2. As on the date o the joint note dated 11. in force. 3. As per this joint n provided there under allowance has not to b of gratuity. Conseque Annexure R-1, while ca allowance has not been 2 order has been made by the he respondent submits that the dated 26.2.2024 has been made vit dated 02.9.2025 filed by Mr. in the Registry, in which, it is y the way of rejoinder, the iming inclusion of special purpose of calculating the it is submitted that the benefits ce were granted to the officer time, when the joint note was he bank and Indian Bank's .05.2015, which is applicable om 01.11.2012, appended as other joint note was signed rties on 11.11.2020, which was om 01.11.2017, appended as ate of retirement of petitioner, 11.11.2020 Annexure R-3 was int note, there is a specific note der which says that special to be reckoned for the purpose equently, in the calculation le calculating gratuity, Special een taken into consideration. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document prays that t liberty to th March 16 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1638-2024 (O & M) 4. It being so, the p special allowance for gratuity is erroneous.” In view of the above, learned that the present contempt petition be ty to the petitioner to seek his remedy i Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 6, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 the plea raised for inclusion of for the purpose of calculating s.” earned counsel for the petitioner ion be disposed of, however, with medy in accordance with law. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document