FAO-651-20 IN THE HIG 116 Akhil Sharm Muna Singh CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seek enhanc him vide im Accident Cla bearing No. of the Motor 2. reveals that Nos. 2253 a filing and 29 Notice is ye applications. had gone un 2024 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o Sharma Versus Singh @ Kalia and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present nhancement of compensation amoun ide impugned Award dated 11.10.2 ent Claims Tribunal, Yamuna Nagar a No. MACP-135-2016 dated 22.04.2 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The matter pertains to year s that along with the present appeal, 2253 and 2252-CII-2024 for condona and 294 days delay in refilling the mai is yet to the issued in the main ap ations. On the last date of hearing also un-represented. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-651-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.02.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA esent appeal the appellant-claimant mount of ₹10,93,576/- awarded to 1.10.2022, by the learned Motor agar at Jagadhri, in a claim petition 22.04.2016 filed under Section 166 ear 2024. Perusal of the case file ppeal, 02 applications bearing CM ondonation of delay of 23 days in he main appeal have also been filed. ain appeal as well as the aforesaid g also i.e. 01.05.2025, the appellant ant to otor 166 file CM s in . said nt RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.12 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-651-20 3. appearing fo counsel had put in appear 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution 5. 6. 11.02.2026 rishu 2024 (O&M) -2- Today, in the first round of he ring for the appellant had sought a el had refused to give his attendance. appearance on behalf of the appellant. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable of hearing, learned proxy counsel ght a pass-over. However, learned ance. In the second round none has ellant. facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned has sent the the ly his this RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.12 13:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.