IN TH 206 Jitender Sh. Anura Secretaria CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate Be State of Ha “…to con passed in representat 07.2.2024 i is further decision so period of t this order.” COCP-3317-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.3317 o Date of decision Versus nurag Rastogi, Principal Secretary etariat, Sector-1, Chandigarh and an AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. S.S.Mor, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 05.4.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-9798 of Haryana and others”, whereby the consider subsequent development in the matter of Naveen & othe entation dated 16.12.2023, in comp 024 in CWP No.2672 of 2024 (supra her directed that in case the resp n so far, the same be taken forthwi of two months from the date of re er.” 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 3317 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-19.01.2026 …..Petitioner retary, 4th Floor, Haryana Civil and another …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 9798-2025 titled as “Jitender vs. by the respondents were directed ents including the judgment others (supra) while deciding compliance of the order dated upra), if not already decided. It respondents have not taken a rthwith and preferably within a f receipt of a certified copy of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.21 18.39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document instructions Bench of Selection C quashed. I Bench, RA reserved o selection st action in th respondent present con learned cou disposed o January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-3317-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the resp uctions that vide order dated 31.5.20 h of this Court in LPA-1037-2023 ction Commission vs. Rahul and anoth hed. It is submitted that against the h, RALP-19-2026 has been preferred ved on 16.1.2026. It is submitted tion stands quashed; and therefore, the n in the present contempt petition. In view of the submissio ndents-State, learned counsel for the nt contempt petition may be disposed In view of the above facts and ed counsel for the petitioner, the prese osed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 19, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 e respondents-State informs on 31.5.2024 passed by a Division 2023 titled as “Haryana Staff another”, the entire result stands st the said order of the Division eferred, in which order has been itted that as of now the entire ore, the petitioner has no cause of missions made on behalf of or the petitioner submits that the posed of as such. s and the submissions made by e present contempt petition stands if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.21 18.39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document