Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1928 (PAT)

Sita Ram Pandey v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./392/2024 · 2026-03-10

Praveen Kumar

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.392 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-135 Year-2019 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Sita Ram Pandey S/o Late Nirmal Kumar Pandey R/o Gayghat, Southern Gali, P.S- Alamganj, District-Patna 2. Rekha Devi W/o Sita Ram Pandey R/o Gayghat, Southern Gali, P.S- Alamganj, District-Patna 3. Subodh Kumar @ Subodh @ Pancham Pandey S/o Late Ram Prasad Pandey R/o Gayghat, Kharakuan, P.S-Alamganj, District-Patna. 4. Ratan Kumar Pandey @ Ratan Pandey S/o Late Nirmal Kumar Pandey R/o Mohalla-Gayghat Southern Gali, P.S-Alamganj, District-Patna. 5. Gunjan Devi @ Gunja Devi W/o Ratan Kumar Pandey R/o Mohalla- Gayghat Southern Gali, P.S-Alamganj, District-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar bihar 2. Kiran Kumar D/o Awadhesh Kumar Pathak R/o Sai Colony, Gandhi School Road, West of Jagat Narayan Lal College,P.S-Khagaul, District-Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nagendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by way of present application, the petitioners have challenged the order taking cognizance passed by the A.C.J.M., V, Danapur in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 135 of 2019 but, during pendency of the present application, charges came to be framed against the petitioners, thus, he seeks permission to withdraw Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.392 of 2024(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 this application. 2. Permission, as sough for, is accorded. 3.Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. brajesh/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T