Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1921 (AP)

SENIOR DIV.RAILWAY MANAGER,VSP,AND 3 v. DEEMUDU,VSP

WP/32164/2012 · 2026-07-08

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010048312012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA I.A. No.2 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO: 32164 OF 2012 I.A. No.2 OF 2024 Between: 1. Senior Divisional Railway Manager, East Coast Railways, Waltair Visakhapatnam. 2. The Additional Senior Divisional, Railway Manager, East Coast Railway, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Chief Commercial manager. East Coast Railway, Chandrashekarpur Bhuvaneswar, Orissa State. 4. The Union of India, rep.by Its General manager, East Coast Railway, Bhuvaneshwar, Orissa State. ...Petitioners/Petitioners AND w Deemudu VSP, Occ: Ex.CTIII, Visakhapatnam East Coast Railway, Waltair R/o. H.No. 44, 209/8 Railway New Colony Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents/Respondents Petition under Order 9 Rule 9 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the dismissal for non-prosecution order Dt.25-07-2024 in W.P.No.32164/2012 and restore the same. WRIT PETITION NO: 32164 OF 2012 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling the records relating to the OA No. 240/2010 dated 11.07.2012 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and set aside the same and confirm the punishment of compulsory retirement passed by the respondent No.1 vide Punishment Notice No. WAT/G/MAJOR/COMMI_/VSKP /08/741 /573 Dated 05.01.2009 and further confirmed by the appellate authorities and revisional authorities i.e respondents 2 and 3. lA NO: 1 OF 2012fWPMP 41000 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to forthwith suspend the order dated 11.07.2012 in OA 240/2010 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI PRABHAKAR PERI Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY The Court made the following order: Considering the submissions, this interlocutory Application is allowed and the Writ Petition is restored to file. Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Yosyula Bhaskara Rao, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri Prabhakar Peri, Advocate [OPUC] OneCC to Sri Venkateswerllu Kesamsetty, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2. 3. 4. Cnr ▼ HIGH COURT Cnr DATED:04/08/2025 LIST THE MATTER ON 01.09.2025 ORDER I.A. No.2 of 2024 in WP NO. 32164 OF 2012 ^ 0 7 AUG 2025 intSectio]^^ ALLOWING THE I.A. No.2 of 2024 RESTORED THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS