Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1920 (GAU)

NO. G/5016410P RIFLEMAN/GD KRISHAN MURARI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/4882/2024 · 2026-02-01

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010197252024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4882/2024 NO. G/5016410P RIFLEMAN/GD KRISHAN MURARI S/O- ASHOK KUMAR, DISCHARGED FROM SERVICE BY THE COMMANDANT, 15TH ASSAM RIFLES, C/O- 99 APO, PIN- 932015. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI- 110001. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ASSAM RIFLES HEAD QUARTER MAHANIDESHALAYA ASSAM RIFLES SHILLONG MEGHALAYA-11. 3:THE INSPECTOR GENERAL ASSAM RIFLES (SOUTH) HEAD QUARTER IGAR (SOUTH) C/O 99 APO PIN- 932555. 4:THE COMMANDANT 15TH ASSAM RIFLES C/O- 99 APO PIN- 932015 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. V. Kumar, Advocate Page No.# 2/2 For the respondent (s) : XXXX BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 02.02.2026 Mr. V. Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition. He, however, submits that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition should not preclude the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition claiming pensionary benefits. 2. The instant writ petition is filed challenging the discharge order. The challenge to the discharge order and the claim for pensionary benefits being separate, the withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not preclude the petitioner to avail such remedies. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal without prejudice to the petitioner’s rights to file a fresh writ petition claiming pensionary benefits, if so permissible under law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant