BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. dated 11.07.2024, registered at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat, under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61 BNS Arms Act. 2. Commissioner of Police, Mohana, District Sonipat, filed in the Court, is taken on record. 3. been in cu implication. His name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co accused, Kulbir, as per which he had allegedly done recce. been framed on 07.10.2024, however, only 3 witnesses st Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. dated 11.07.2024, registered at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat, under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61 BNS Status report by way of affidavit of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mohana, District Sonipat, filed in the Court, is taken on record. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner been in custody for 1 year, 6 months and 6 days. implication. His name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co accused, Kulbir, as per which he had allegedly done recce. been framed on 07.10.2024, however, only 3 witnesses st Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.265 dated 11.07.2024, registered at Police Station Sadar Gohana, District Sonepat, under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61 BNS and Section 25 of the Status report by way of affidavit of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mohana, District Sonipat, filed in the Court, is Learned counsel contends that the petitioner, 18-year-old, has 1 year, 6 months and 6 days. He alleges false implication. His name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co- accused, Kulbir, as per which he had allegedly done recce. Charges have been framed on 07.10.2024, however, only 3 witnesses stand examined so PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. far and there are still 38 more to go. The petitioner is not involved in any other case. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations levelled by the co-accused against the petitioner of having done recce of the place of occurrence. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case and the petitioner being not involved in any other case. 5. Heard. 6. 07.10.2024, out of 41 PWs, only 3 have been examined; 9. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/heavy surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of. (v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner. (vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court. (viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court. (ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner. 10. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. 11. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.