IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5509 of 2024 ====================================================== Bindeshwar Roy Son of Late Babu Lal Ray, Resident of Village- Bajitpur Majhauli, P.S.- Bochahan, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Commissioner-cum-Arbitrator, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 3. The D.M.-cum-Collector, Muzaffarpur, 4. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur. 5. National Highway Authority Of India, through its Project Director, NH- 527C, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate : Mrs. Bela Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Pleader 11 For the NHAI : Mr. Saket Tiwary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 05-05-2026 Heard Mrs. Bela Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State as also learned counsel for the National Highway Authority of India. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) for directing and commanding the respondent to quash the order dated 26.10.23 (Ann-4) passed by respondent no.-2, the Commissioner -cum- Arbitrator, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur in Arbitration case no. 66/2019 "Bindeshwar Rai Vrs. State Government and Patna High Court CWJC No.5509 of 2024(2) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 others" by which he has rejected the claim of compensation to the petitioner on basis of nature of his acquired land as commercial. (ii) for directing and commanding the respondent to pay the compensation of his acquired land on basis of commercial nature of the land in place of residential in nature. (iii) and also for any other relief/ relieves for which petitioners are found to be legally entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the competent Civil Court for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U