SAYED ISFAK HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/3097/2024 · 2026-03-16
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1881 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1881 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010117842024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3097/2024 SAYED ISFAK HUSSAIN S/O- SAMSUDDIN, R/O- VILLAGE- BOGACHOLA, MOUZA- DIPILA SUB- DIVISION-MANGALDOI, DISTRICT- DARRANG, P.O. TENGARA, P.S.
SIPAJHAR, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN- 781126 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECONDARY, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DMLR DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DARRANG MANGALDOI ASSAM PIN- 784125 4:THE UNDER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 KAMRUP (M) ASSA
Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Petitioner : M HOSSAIN, A JUBARIA,A KASHYAP,MR. R C DAS,MR J HUSSAIN,MD A WADUD Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, WATER RESOURCE,SC, REVENUE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 17.03.2026 Shri R.C. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions not to press this writ petition. He has also prayed for a liberty. Ms. M. Barman, learned State Counsel, Assam and Ms. Tinlung, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri R.M. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Water Resource Department have submitted that though they do not have any objection with regard to the aspect of withdrawal of this writ petition, they have serious reservations on the aspect of granting liberty. A similar stand has been taken by Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department. Under the aforesaid circumstances, while this writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, it is made clear that only on a fresh cause of action, the petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant