Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1870 (CAL)

PADMA SONTHALIA v. VIVEK KUMAR KATHOTIA

EC/50/2024 · 2026-05-07

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OD- 13 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE EC/50/2024 PADMA SONTHALIA VS VIVEK KUMAR KATHOTIA BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY Date: 7th May, 2026 Appearance: Mr. Varun Kothari, Adv. Mr. Nikunj Berlia, Adv. Mohit Chamaria, Adv. …for decree-holder The Court:- The Learned Advocate representing the decree-holder submitted to have received the payment of Rs. 26 Lakhs on 19th March, 2026 through RTGS vide Reference no. KKBKR52026031900883574, ICICI Bank account no. 643801510419. A xerox copy of the RTGS be kept on record. The Learned Advocate representing the decree-holder further submitted that the parties to the dispute had entered into an amicable settlement, pursuant to which the settled amount had been disbursed in favour of the decree-holder and accordingly the decree is said to have been complied with. Subsequent thereto the decree-holder has placed a written instruction through the Learned Advocate representing the decree-holder, expressing her 2 desire not to proceed with the instant execution proceedings. Let the said written instruction be kept on record. Under such circumstances, the instant EC/50/2024 is disposed of. (ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.) DB