Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1855 (PNJ)

M/S DASHMESH STONE CRUSHER v. JASPREET TALWAR , IAS AND ANOTHER

COCP/5721/2025 · 2026-01-09

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 203-III M/s Dashm Smt. Jaspr Punjab CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation of Division Dashmesh interim ord by another 2024 titled others” vid the action apply for direct that COCP-5721-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5721 Date of decision Dashmesh Stone Crusher Versus Jaspreet Talwar, IAS, Additional C AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Tushaar Madaan, Advocat for the petitioner. Mr. Amtiaz Sandhu, AAG, Pu Mr. Narendra Kumar, SDO, D Geology Nangal Sub Division HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of interim order dated 20.8.2025 Bench of this Court in CWP mesh Stone Crusher vs. State of Pu im order was granted in terms of orde other Division Bench in CWP Nos.29 titled as “M/s Jai Ambey Stone Crus rs” vide which it was opined that “…. tion of the respondents in not perm for renewal of registration is not that the petitioner(s) be permitte 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5721 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-09.01.2026 …..Petitioner onal Chief Secretary to Govt. of …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA dvocate G, Punjab assisted by Drainage-cum-Mining and vision. ition has been filed alleging .2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a WP-23998-2025 titled as “M/s of Punjab and others”, whereby of order dated 28.10.2024 passed os.29380 to 29382 and 29389 of e Crusher vs. State of Punjab and “…..In our considered opinion, permitting the petitioner(s) to not justified. Accordingly, we itted to apply on deposit of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.12 18.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document necessary portal…..” submits tha has been c may be per January 0 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5721-2025 (O & M) ary fees and the respondents-State …..”. At the very outset, learned its that the Writ Court order dated een complied with by the responden be permitted to withdraw the present c Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 09, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 State shall open the necessary arned counsel for the petitioner ated 20.08.2025 (Annexure P-1) ondent(s)/authority, therefore, he esent contempt petition. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.12 18.20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document