Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040010472024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/341/2024 Shri Tony Borang and 3 Ors Son of Late Ogan Borang, resident of Remi village, PO and PS Dambuk, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Obinam Ratan Perme Age: Occupation : Wife of Shri Robin Perme resident of village Bizari PO and PS Dambuk Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh 3: Smti Alina Ratan Age: Occupation : Wife of Shri Nalo Perme resident of Village Parbuk (Bolik) PO and PS Dambuk Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh 4: Bornali Pait Age: Occupation : Wife of Shri Durgesor Pait resident of Village Keba PO and PS Dambuk Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Prades VERSUS The Deputy Commissioner and 6 Ors Lower Dibang Valley District, Roing, Arunachal Pradesh 2:The Member Secrtary Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Lower Dibang Valley District Roing Arunachal Pradesh 3:The State Election Commission Age: 0 Occupation : Nirvachan Bhawan Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 4:The State Bharatiya Janata Party Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the State President Vivek Vihar Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 5:The State Vice President cum Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : State Disciplinary Action Committee Bharatiya Janata Party Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 6:The District President Age: 0 Occupation : Bharatiya Janata Party Lower Dibang Valley District Roing Arunachal Pradesh. 7:The District Vice President cum Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : District Disciplinary Action Committee Lower Dibang Valley District Bharatiya Janata Party Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Arup Bhatttacharjee, Doli Mara,G T Sangma,D ZIrdo Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), C Perme,Tamo Taggu,S/C State Election Commission,Ajin Page No.# 3/3 Apang, Sr. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE 19.02.2026 Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous. Mr. T. Taggu, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 is present. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed on having been become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant