APHC010069342024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 873/2024 Between: 1. M.CHAITANYA KUMAR, S/O. GOWRI SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. PRESENTLY WORKING AS MAHANYASA PARAYANADAR, SRI BRAMARAMBHA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYAL DISTRICT, AP. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHRI PEDDIRAJU, PRESENTLY WORKING AS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI BHRAMARAMBA MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY VARLA DEVASTHANAM, SRISAILAM, NANDYAL DISTRICT, AP. 2. SHRI S SATYANARAYANA IAS, PRESENTLY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS DEPRATMENT, GHXG GPF, OPP S. GRAND RESTAURANT, ONE CENTER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH - 521 225. R 2 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DT.19.04.2024. VIDE IA NO.1 OF 2024 IN CC NO.873 OF 2024. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon and punish the respondent/Contemnor for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP.No.32292/2023 dated 15.12.2023, under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act a Article 215 of Constitution of India, in the interest of Justice, and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Proposed respondent 2 as party respondent 2/ contemnor in CC. No. 873/2024, in the interest of justice, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY 2. B S SHIVAJI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.873 of 2024 ORDER: Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court have been complied with by the respondents. The said fact was not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.06.2026 SJ 4 32 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.873 of 2024 17.06.2026 SSJJ