Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1848 (AP)

PRASANNA DURGA MAHILA PODUPU SANGAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/20283/2024 · 2026-06-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010396912024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20283/2024 Between: PRASANNA DURGA MAHILA PODUPU SANGAM, REP BY SECRETARY BOMMALI UMA AGED 40 YEARS, D.NO.77-103-3, PRAJA SHEKTHI NAGAR , PAYAKAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA- 520015 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. . 3. THE JOINT DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE ESTATE OFFICER, RYTHU BAZAR, SAMBAMURTHY ROAD, VIJAYAWADA. NTR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the high handed action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of Shop at Rythu bazaar, Sambamurthy road, Vijayawada , NTR District, without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice 2 and in contrary to the article 14, 19 and 300A of Constitution of India, and consequently, direct the respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners subject property and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any corrosive action against my shop or not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Shop at Rythu bazaar, Sambamurthy road, Vijayawada, NTR District, pending finalization of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: TALLAPRAGADA SRIRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: ORDER: None represented the petitioner. 2. Ms.M.Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture submits that the petitioner has already vacated from the shop, thereby, the relief has became infructuous and no further orders are required in this matter. 3. Having regard to the above submissions, the present writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.06.2026 KRS 3 75 THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20283 of 2024 DATE:16.06.2026 KRS