Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1827 (CAL)

RAM DAYAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRR/2339/2024 · 2026-03-20

Ajay Kumar Gupta

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13 2200..0033..22002266 Ct. No. 32 Jayanta CRR/2339/2024 + IA NO: CRAN/2/2026 RAM DAYAL AND ANOTHER VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL Adv. Abhijit Kumar Adhya …. For the Petitioner. Sr. Adv. Sandipan Ganguly Adv. Apalak Basu Adv. Sanghamitra Mridha …. For the Opposite Party No. 2. Adv. Suman De Adv. Abhinaba Mukherjee … for the State. CRR/2339/2024 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned Counsels. 2. In course of hearing, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw this case with liberty to file afresh since the application is not in proper form. 3. Heard, considered. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the instant application being CRR 2339 of 2024 is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. 6. The petitioner shall at liberty to substitute the certified copy by the photocopy of the same and take back the original certified copy for further steps. 2 7. Department is directed to do the needful. IA NO: CRAN/2/2026 8. Accordingly, CRAN 2 of 2026 is also, thus, dismissed as withdrawn. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)