APHC010389392024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 19985/2024 Between: 1. SRI KANDREGULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O SADHU RAO, AGED 41 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 9-21, GAVARA JAGGAYYAPALEM, PENDURTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPTD., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE) AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, STAMPS AND REGISTRATION TOWN KOTHAROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE JOINT SUB REGISTRAR, , STAMPS AND REGISTRATION GAJUWAKA. 4. THE SATAVANAHA COOP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, (REGN NO. B-1962) REPTD., BY ITS SECRETARY SRI. KARRI GANESWARA RAO, S/O LATE MODINAIDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BC ROAD, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. SRI DODDI SURYA RAO, , S/O LATE SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. TREASURER, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF 20-131/10, GANAPATHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2 6. SRI MARISETTI MALLEPULU, S/O LATE PENTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. PRESIDENT, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF 6-57-26, SRAMIKNAGAR, CHINAGANTYADA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. SRI SARAKAM NAGA APPARAO, S/O LATE APPALANAIDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS. DIRECTOR, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF 49-41-10/3, GAYATRI COMPLEX, NGGO'S COLONY, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 8. SRI ADHIKASETTI GANESH, , S/O ESWAR RAO, AGED 48 YEARS, DIRECTOR, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF 1-59, GAVARAPETA, S. RAYAVARAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 9. SRI POLIMERA SURYANARAYANA, , S/O LATE VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. DIRECTOR, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF 14-8-1, BC ROAD GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 10. SRI PILLA SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE VEERANNA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, DIRECTOR, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF 64-3-11/1, RAMNAGAR, SRIHARIPURAM, MALKAPURAM PO., VISAKHAPATNAM. 11. SRI SILAPARASETTI SANYASI RAO, , S/O LATE APPANNA, AGED 73 YEARS. DIRECTOR, SATAVAHANA CO-OP HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY, RESIDENT OF VADRAPALLI, 0PP. GOVT. SCHOOL, MUNAGAPAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, direction or a writ, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in entertaining a deed of unilateral cancellation of a General Power of Attorney registered as document No. 4835/2021 dated 30/10/2021 by a deed of Revocation of General Power of Attorney registered as document No. 7550/2024 dated 15/07/2024 as illegal, contrary to the provisions of the Indian Contract 3 Act 1872 apart from being vitiated by gross non-application of mind and also being in violation of the rights guaranteed by Art. 300-A of the Constitution of Indi and consequent to the declaration, set aside the deed of revocation registered as document No. 7550/2024 dated 15/07/2024 and restore the General Power of Attorney registered as document No. 4835/2021 dated 30/10/2021 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the deed of revocation registered as document No. 7550/2024 dated 15/07/2024 pending disposal of the writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to record the compromise and dispose of the writ petition in terms of the MoU dated 20/04/2026, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 2. V V SATISH 4 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner and as well as the unofficial respondents entered into a compromise by way of MoU dated 20.04.2026. In terms of the said compromise, the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. For which, the learned counsel for the unofficial respondents also expressed no objection for the same. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 06.05.2026 NNN