Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1812 (PNJ)

RAMESH KUMAR GARG v. ANIL KUMAR TEWARI AND OTHERS

CR/2141/2024 · 2026-03-06

Alka Sarin

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

229 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2141-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.03.2026 Ramesh Kumar Garg ... Petitioner(s) Versus Anil Kumar Tewari and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Vishal Garg Narwana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Hitika, Advocate for Mr. Jatin Khurana, Advocate for respondent Nos.15, 21, 22, 23, 37, 43 and 79. Mr. Deep Inder Singh Walia, Advocate for respondent Nos.29, 30, 31, 32, 35, 152. Mr. Shivanshu, Advocate for Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate for respondent No.58. Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Amarsh Dudeja, Advocate for respondent No.63. Mr. Lalit Attri, Advocate and Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.91. Mr. Nakul Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Karan Sirohi, Advocate for the respondent Nos.114 and 115. Mr. Sukhdev Singh, Advocate for respondent No.158. ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas before the Appellate Court where the appeal challenging the same impugned order is pending. Permitted to do so. ANKUR GOYAL 2026.03.09 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CR-2141-2024 (O&M) --2-- 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 06.03.2026 Ankur Goyal ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO ANKUR GOYAL 2026.03.09 09:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment