DR. RAMGOPAL ATAL S/O LATE SHRI PRABHATI LAL, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4037/2024 · 2026-05-04
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1786 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1786 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4037/2024 Dr. Ramgopal Atal S/o Late Shri Prabhati Lal, R/o B-494, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Jaipur
3. S.H.O. Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur City (South) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Singh for Mr. Devendra Kumar Bharadwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/05/2026
1. The instant petition has been preferred by the complainant- petitioner seeking directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting fair and impartial investigation of FIR No782/2021, registered with Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South).
2. On earlier occasions, this Court vide orders dated 26.03.2025 and 13.04.2026 instructed the Public Prosecutor to get the factual report of investigation conducted so far in the aforementioned FIR. Pursuant to the aforesaid orders, factual report has been received from the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Mansarover, Jaipur (South) which indicates that the investigation is pending and notices have been issued to the accused.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-4037/2024]
3. More than five years have passed after registration of the impugned FIR, but till date, the investigation is proceeding at a snail’s pace. It is expected from the Investigating Officer to make all possible endeavours to conclude the investigation and submit the result of investigation, under Section 173 Cr.P.C., expeditiously as early as possible.
4. In-spite of the above, in case the complainant-petitioner feels aggrieved by any inaction on the part of the Investigating Officer, he would be at liberty to submit a representation before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (South) for redressal of his grievance.
5. In case such representation is submitted by the complainant- petitioner, it is expected from the DCP, Jaipur (South) to consider the same and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/11