Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1780 (AP)

M DEVA DHEERAJ REDDY v. SRI G SAI PRASAD

CC/3524/2024 · 2026-04-23

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010377402024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3524/2024 Between: 1. M DEVA DHEERAJ REDDY, S/O.SUKUMAR REDDY, AGED 58 YEARS,MARUTHI GROUND APARTMENT, FLAT.NO.504,TEACHERS COLONY,MUSUNUR(V), KAVALI MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD, SPL.CHIEF SECRETARY, TO STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. 2. P KRISHNA MOHAN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NELLORE NORTH DIVISION, NELLORE,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. P S RAGHAVAIAH, COMMISSIONER (CADA), CUM STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, VIJAYAWADA. 4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. .. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 01.11.2023 of this Hon'ble Court made In WP. No. 34577/2022 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of W.P.No.34577 of 2022 before the Hon’ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:3524/2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 01.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.34577 of 2022. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket order that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the earlier occasion i.e., on 21.04.2026. Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders dated 01.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.34577 of 2022 are complied with and also issued proceedings dated 20.04.2026 to that effect. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 5. Recording the submission made, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24.04.2026 BSP 79 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.3524 of 2024 24.04.2026 BSP