IN THE HIGH C Sr. No.161 M/s Shiv Shankar State of Punjab and CORAM : HON'B HON'B Present : Mr. Am Mr. R. Mr. An DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learne the petitioner’s favo 10.07.2024 rendere Mills vs. Food Corp 2. In the allowed in the sam case (supra). 19.03.2026 shamsher IGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN Industries Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BA Aman Bansal, Advocate, for the pe R. S. Pandher, Addl. A. G., Punjab Anupam Singla, Advocate, for resp * * * * * AL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties agree s favour by the judgment of a Divisi ndered in CWP-2038-2011-M/s Shree Corporation of India, Punjab. In the light of the above consensus, e same terms as M/s Shree Padmav Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No RYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7606-2026 Date of decision : 19.03.2026 .…. Petitioner ..... Respondents AK SIBAL A BANERJI petitioner. Punjab. for respondent No. 5. agree that this petition is covered in Division Bench of this Court dated hree Padmavati Rice Pulse & Oil ensus, the instant petition is also mavati Rice Pulse & Oil Mills’s [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE s / No s / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.03.25 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh