H.M. BHARDWAJ ALIAS HUNNAMAL BHARDWAJ v. VINAY KUMAR, IRPS, SECRETARY, HARYANA STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION
COCP/4216/2024 · 2026-03-09
Nidhi Gupta
Contempt Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1749 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1749 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 211
Dr. H.M. B
Vinay Ku Commissio
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
violation o Division B Bhardwaj v
“…the clai accordingl
directed to including t shall also b
submits tha COCP-4216-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.4216 o
Date of decision .M. Bhardwaj alias Hunnamal Bha Versus y Kumar, IRPS, Secretary, H mission, Panchkula
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mrs. Jai Shree Kaushik, Advo for the petitioner.
Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 15.2.2024 (An Bench of this Court in CWP-2993 dwaj vs. State of Haryana and another claim of the petitioner is found to ingly, the writ petition is allowe d to release full remuneration ing the pension or retiral benefits. lso be granted to the petitioner….”. At the very outset, learned co its that the Writ Court order dated 15.
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4216 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-09.03.2026 al Bhardwaj …..Petitioner y, Haryana Staff Selection …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a 29932-2018 titled as “Dr. H.M. nother”, whereby it was held that d to be sustainable in law and lowed. The respondents are on to the petitioner without its. The consequential benefits .”. ed counsel for the petitioner ted 15.2.2024 (Annexure P-1) has VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 11.13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
been com survives in
disposed of
the petition
March 09 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
COCP-4216-2024 (O & M) complied by the respondent-auth ves in the present contempt petitio sed of. In view of the submissions m etitioner, the present contempt petition Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 9, 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
2 authority, therefore, nothing petition and the same may be ons made by learned counsel for etition is disposed of. if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.11 11.13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document