SATISH DNYANDEO KADAM AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APL/469/2024 · 2026-08-20
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1744 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1744 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
10-APL-469-2024 (CR).odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2024 Satish Dnyandeo Kadam and another ] Applicants VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents ..... Mr. Abhay Jadhavar a/w Ms. Sampada S. Patil, Advocates for Applicants. Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State. ….. CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026 PER COURT :
1. Upon hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicants, and when this Court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the prayers sought in the Application, the learned Advocate for the Applicants sought time to take instructions.
2. After the matter was passed over, the learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions, sought leave to withdraw the Application, with liberty to file an appropriate Application before the appropriate Court. His statement is accepted.
3. In view of the statement made on instructions, the Application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Shailaja SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Digitally signed by SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2026.08.20 17:59:23 +0530