IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 M/S SHIV FORGINGS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Meenakshi Mr. Aftab Singh Khara, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Ms. Haridhi Aggarwal, Advocate and Ms. Rishita, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4 ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned purchased plot No.A The petitioner had sought sanction of the building unit but the same has been rejected on 14.06.2024 without assigning any reason further submits that the on the bifurcated plot. respondents but no ac disposed of with the direction to representations. 2. Issue notice to the respondents. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6151-2026 DATE OF DECISION: S SHIV FORGINGS Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Rahul Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Meenakshi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Aftab Singh Khara, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Ms. Haridhi Aggarwal, Advocate and Ms. Rishita, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4 **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner No.A-10A, after its bifurcation had been allowed by the had sought sanction of the building unit but the same has been rejected on 14.06.2024 without assigning any reason further submits that the petitioner fulfills all the conditions for raising construction on the bifurcated plot. The petitioner has also sent but no action has been taken thereon. He submits that disposed of with the direction to respondent No. Issue notice to the respondents. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2026 DATE OF DECISION: 06.03.2026 … Petitioner ... Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL DEEPAK MANCHANDA with , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aftab Singh Khara, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Vikas Chatrath, Senior Advocate with Ms. Haridhi Aggarwal, Advocate and Ms. Rishita, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4/PSIEC. submits that the petitioner ha after its bifurcation had been allowed by the respondents. had sought sanction of the building plan for a single manufacturing unit but the same has been rejected on 14.06.2024 without assigning any reason. He all the conditions for raising construction sent several representations to the tion has been taken thereon. He submits that the petition No.1 & 2 to consider and decide the had respondents. manufacturing . He all the conditions for raising construction to the be 2 to consider and decide the SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.03.06 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-6151-2026 -2- 3. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Aftab Singh Khara, Senior DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents/State. Ms. Haridhi Aggarwal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.3 & 4. 4. Heard. 5. In view of the limited prayer, the petition is disposed of with the direction to respondents No.3 & 4 to consider and decide the representations dated 31.10.2025 (Annexure P-21 to 23) within a period of two months from now. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 06.03.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.03.06 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document