Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1730 (BOM)

THE CANTONMENT BOARD DEOLALI THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER v. NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH COMMISSIONER

WP/11319/2024 · 2026-08-21

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(903)-WP-11319-24.odt PANCHAL IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11319 OF 2024 The Cantonment Board Deolali & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors. ...Respondents ... Mr. Prashant Trivedi i/by Neeta V. Masurkar, for the Petitioners. Mr. Rupesh Lanjekar, for Respondent No.1. Mr. R. D. Soni a/w Mr. V. R. Kasle i/by Ram & Co., for Respondent No.3. Mr. S. P. Kamble, AGP for the Respondent - State. ... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ. & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J. DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2026. P.C.: 1. The learned Advocate for the Petitioners has tendered a praecipe dated 20th August, 2026 on instructions from the Petitioners to withdraw this Petition. 2. The said praecipe is marked as ‘X’ for identification. 3. In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. 1 JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Digitally signed by JAYANT VISHWANATH SALUNKE Date: 2026.08.24 11:45:09 +0530 (903)-WP-11319-24.odt 4. Needless to state that if any fresh cause of action arises and the Petitioners are aggrieved, the Petitioners would be at liberty to avail of a remedy as is permissible in law. [GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.] [ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE] 2