Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1727 (PNJ)

SHIMBHU DAYAL v. CHANDGI RAM AND OTHERS

RSA/1429/2020 · 2026-04-27

Nidhi Gupta

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-1429- IN THE HIG 114 Shimbhu Da Chandgi Ram CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby suit with his co 2. issued in th inception, th times i.e. 19.12.2024 repeatedly a appellant or 19.12.2024, a co-ordinate -2020 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o hu Dayal Versus gi Ram and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant/plaintiff No. 1 is rrent judgments and decrees rendered suit for declaration and permanent is co-plaintiffs has been dismissed. The matter pertains to the year in the same. Perusal of the order ion, the present second appeal has b i.e. on 19.04.2023, 19.09.2023, 2024 and 25.09.2025 (last date of edly adjourned either at the reques or on account of non-appearance o 2024, when this case was listed, follow rdinate Bench of this Court:- “The present appeal pert same is still at the stage of pre notice of motion is yet to be iss been adjourned on the request ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1429-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA 1 is in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts anent injunction filed by him along e year 2020 and notice is yet to be order-sheets reveals that since the has been listed for hearing for 06 2023, 27.02.2024, 30.07.2024, te of hearing); and the same was request of learned counsel for the ance on behalf of the appellant. On , following order has been passed by pertains to the year 2020 and the preliminary hearing inasmuch as e issued. Repeatedly the case has uest of the learned counsel for the the urts long o be the r 06 024, was the On d by he as as he RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.28 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1429- 3. was adjourn even in the s of the appell 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is lef non-prosecu 5. 6. 27.04.2026 rishu -2020 (O&M) -2- appellant. Today again a writte is circulated on behalf of the co ground that he is down with justice, adjourned to 25.09.2025 On the last date of hearing i.e. djourned at the request of learned cou n the second round of hearing, none ha appellant. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha is seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option excep rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ritten request for an adjournment e counsel for the appellant on the ith viral fever. In the interest of .2025.” ng i.e. 25.09.2025, again the matter ed counsel for the appellant. Today, one has put in appearance on behalf facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No nt he of atter day, half llant sent the the ly his this r RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.28 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.