KUNAL UTTAMRAO MALE v. THE PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS
WP/2217/2024 · 2026-07-02
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1722 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1722 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 of 2 WP.2217.2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2217 OF 2024 Kunal Uttamrao Mate Petitioner versus The Pune Municipal Corporation and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8496 OF 2025 Kunal Uttamrao Mate Petitioner versus The Pune Municipal Corporation and others Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.846 OF 2024 Mayur Arun Mandhare and others Petitioners versus The Pune Municipal Corporation and others Respondents _______ Mr.Sachin K.Hande, for Petitioners. None for Respondent _______ CORAM:
G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. DATE: 9th July 2026 P.C.
1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2. Called out for Speaking to the Minutes of Judgment and Order dated 2nd July 2026. It is stated that the appearance of advocate on record for the Petitioners is not recorded in the Judgment and Order dated 2nd July 2026. M.S.Thatte MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Digitally signed by MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2026.07.10 16:06:26 +0530
2 of 2 WP.2217.2024.DOC
3. We accordingly order that appearance of Mr.Sachin K.Hande, Advocate on record for Petitioners, be corrected and shown as follows :
“Mr.A.V.Anturkar, Senior Advocate a/w.Mr.Atharva Date, Ms.Poonam Pal i/by Mr.Sachin Hande for the petitioners in WP/846/2024, WP/2217/2024 and WP/8496/2025.”
4. The Judgment and Order dated 2nd July 2026 be corrected accordingly and made available to the parties.
(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) M.S.Thatte