RSA-1427- IN THE HIG 267 Kamla Devi Dakshini Ha CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent fi for declarati filed by the p 2. law involved Court is bar since been d judgment da Kumar vs. appeal(s), La 3. of, with liber remedy as av -2024 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Devi (since deceased) through her LR Versus ini Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and ot M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellant. Mr. Kewal Krishan, Advocate f Mr. SK Mahajan, Advocate for I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-plaintiff is in rrent findings rendered by both the Dis claration along with consequential re y the plaintiff was dismissed. Learned counsel for the respon volved in the present appeal as to wh is barred in view of Section 145 of t been decided by the Hon’ble Divisio ent dated 14.05.2025 passed in RSA vs. Sub Divisional Officer and A Law Finder Doc Id # 2730461. In view of the above, the prese th liberty to the appellant-plaintiff to ta available, in accordance with law ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1427-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.02.2026 her LRs .… Appellant and others .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA ocate for te for the respondents. in second appeal against the District Courts, whereby the suit tial relief of permanent injunction respondent submits that question of to whether jurisdiction of the Civil 45 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has Division Bench of this Court vide RSA-4181-2016 titled as ‘Mahesh and Another’ and other connected present second appeal is disposed to take recourse to the appropriate law. suit n of ivil has vide esh cted sed riate RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.18 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1427- 4. made in the res judicata plaintiff. 5. 6. Registered P Memo of Pa
17.02.2026 rishu -2024 (O&M) -2- It is made clear that any ev in the impugned judgments and de cata in any subsequent proceeding Pending application(s), if any, s Registry is directed to send a ered Post to the appellant-plaintiff at of Parties. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ny evidence recorded/observations nd decrees would not operate as eedings initiated by the appellant- any, shall stands disposed of. send a copy of this order through at the address mentioned in the ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ions e as ugh the RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.18 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.