982 CA NO. 1818 OF 2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 982 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1818 OF 2024 IN FAST/3868/2024 Maharashtra State Roadt Ransportation Corporation Through Its Divsional Controller Parbhani VERSUS Nandabai Shatrughn Bhisad And Anr ... Mr. D. S. Bagul, Advocate for Applicant Mr. P. C. Mayure, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1819 OF 2024 IN FAST/3868/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12207 OF 2025 IN FAST/3868/2024 …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 25.06.2026 PER COURT :- APPLICATION FOR STAY 1. This is an application seeking stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and award. 2. The learned advocate for the applicant / appellant submits that the entire amount as per the impugned judgment and award is deposited in this Court. 3. In view of the above, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of. 1 of 3 (( 2 )) 982 CA NO. 1818 OF 2024 APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF AMOUNT 1. This is an application seeking permission to withdraw the amount deposited in this Court pursuant to the award. 2. Heard the learned advocates for both sides. 3. Learned advocate for respondent strongly opposed the application. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein and considering the arguments of both the sides, it would be proper to partly allow the application. Hence, the following order: ::ORDER:: a. The application is partly allowed. b. The applicant/s is/are permitted to withdraw 75% of the amount out of the amount deposited by the appellant in this court, with accrued interest thereon, on furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. APPLICATION FOR DELAY 1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 252 days caused in filing the first appeal. 2 of 3 (( 3 )) 982 CA NO. 1818 OF 2024 3. The learned Advocate for respondent strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the following order: ::ORDER:: a. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of. b. The delay of 252 days caused in filing the first appeal is condoned. FIRST APPEAL 1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 06.08.2026. 2. Mr. P. C. Mayure, learned Advocate waives service of notice for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 3 of 3