942 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 942 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 72 OF 2024 Dr. Prajwalit S/o. Sundarrao Raut VERSUS Priyanka W/o. Prajwalit Raut __________________________________________________________ Adv. Kishor J. Ghute Patil for the Appellant - Absent __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 31.07.2026 PER COURT : 1] None appears for the Appellant - Husband. 2] Though the notice issued to the Respondent– Wife at the instance of the appellant was returned unserved, on going through the bailiff's report, it appears that the notice could not be served upon the Respondent– Wife since she had already started cohabiting with the Appellant–Husband. Thus, it appears that the parties have settled their dispute and have started residing together. 3] Be that as it may, the appellant has also failed to take steps for effecting service upon the respondent despite directions issued by this Court. It, therefore, appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:32991-DB