Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1663 (AP)

YALAMARI SREERAMA KRISHNA v. NATRA MOHAN RAO

CRP/2777/2024 · 2026-04-15

Ravi Cheemalapati

Original Suitbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010471522024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2777/2024 Between: 1. YALAMARI SREERAMA KRISHNA, S/O VENKATA DURGAM, AGE 59 YEARS, RESIDENT OF PLOT NO 504, D. NO. 3-369/B, SATYAM RESIDENCY, SAVITRI NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY ...PETITIONER AND 1. NATRA MOHAN RAO, S/o Late Bheeshmudu, Age 63 Years, Resident of. D.No 36-91-58, Ravindra Nagar, Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Order dt 20.06.2024in LA. No. 290 of 2024 in OS No.342of 2018 on the file of II Additional Civil Judge(Senior Disvision) Visakhapatnam and direct the Learned Judge to Recall the PW-3 for cross examination and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay the further proceedings in OS No. 342/2018 on the file of the II Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) Visakhapatnam; till pending disposal of the above civil revision petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHU KUMAR NALI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following order: This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 20.06.2024 passed in I.A.No.290 of 2024 in O.S.No.342 of 2018 by the learned II Addl Civil Judge (senior division), Visakhapatnam. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.342 of 2018 was decreed with costs on 09.05.2025. 4. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous . 5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS