Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010473112024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2562/2024 Between:
1. BADWEL MOHAMMAD ARIF, S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.9/462, RAYACHOTI ROAD, KADIRI TOWN, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. K JAYA CHANDRA REDDY, S/O. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, R/O.
SYDAPURAM, KADIRI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
2. MARAGANIKUNTAKHASIMPEERA KHASIM SAB, S/O. M.RASOOL SAB,
R/O. BASASUPALLI, ODC POST AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
3. MARAGANIKUNTAMAHABOOB BASHA, S/O. KHASIMPEERA, R/O.
BASASUPALLI, ODC POST AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the order of the Judge family court- cum-VII Additional District Judge, Ananthapuramu passed in I.A.No.67/2024 in O.S.No.81/2023 dated 05/09/2024.
IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No.81/2023 on the file of the Family court - cum- VII Additional district Judge, Ananthapuram pending disposal of the revision Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. O M R LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ALLU HARI NARAYANA The Court made the following order:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 05.09.2024 passed in I.A.No.67 of 2024 in O.S.No.81 of 2023 by the learned Judge of Family court-cum-Additional District Court, Ananthapuramu.
2. No representation on both sides.
3. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.81 of 2023 was dismissed without costs on 01.05.2025.
4. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous .
5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS