1 VS,J C.C.No.3867 of 2024 APHC010428022024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3867/2024 Between: 1. BANDI SUBBA REDDY, S/O.VENKATESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O.LINGANNAPALEM VILLAGE, DARSI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. B RAJASHEKAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING (MKTG-II) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PIYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. C HARI KIRAN, COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. B BALU NAIK, CHIEF ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 5. VIJAYA KUMARI, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 6. K SRINU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, JANGAREDDIGUDEM, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 2 VS,J C.C.No.3867 of 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for willfully disobeying the orders of SMT.JUSTICE V.SUJATHA in W.P.No.7522/2024 dated 18-04- 2024 under section 10 to 12 of Contempt Act in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 3. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: 3 VS,J C.C.No.3867 of 2024 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.7522 of 2024 on 18.04.2024, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….this Court feels it appropriate to direct the respondents to pay an amount of Rs.3,36,34,462/- (Three crores thirty six lakhs thirty four thousand four hundred and sixty two only) to the petitioner within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order .….” 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 18.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7522 of 2024 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 10.04.2026 KGR