Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1647 (PAT)

Janardan Singh @ Janardan Prasad Singh v. Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms

MJC/4573/2024 · 2026-03-18

R P Mishra

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4573 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14886 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Janardan Singh @ Janardan Prasad Singh S/o- Late Radha Mohan Singh, R/o- Village- Hurka, P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas. 2. Dhananjay Singh @ Dhananjay Prasad Singh S/o- Late Radha Mohan Singh, R/o- Village- Hurka, P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas. 3. Damodar Singh @ Damodar Prasad Singh S/o- Late Radha Mohan Singh, R/o- Village- Hurka, P.O.- Hurka, P.S.- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Mr. Dipak Kumar Singh, The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat at Patna. 2. Mr. Mayank Warwade, The Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna. 3. Mr. Navin Kumar, The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Sasaram, District- Rohtas. 4. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Prasad Singh, The Additional District Magistrate-cum- Additional Collector, Rohtas (Sasaram), District- Rohtas. 5. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Dehri, District- Rohtas. 6. Mr. Harsh Hari, The Circle Officer/Anchal Adhikari, Anchal- Tilouthu, District- Rohtas. 7. Mrs. Ankita Jain, The Block Development Officer, Tilouthu, Block- Tilouthu. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Swapnil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 6 18-03-2026 Heard the parties. Patna High Court MJC No.4573 of 2024(6) dt.18-03-2026 2/3 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: “1. That the instant contempt application is being preferred for non-compliance of the order dt.-30.09.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.- 14886 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra whereby and whereunder the hon'ble court was pleased to give a direction, observing therein that "Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Circle Officer (Respondent No.-6 herein) is directed to consider the online application bearing Grievance I.D. 20243202006375 dated 11.03.2024 (Annexure-P/3) and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order."” 3. A show-cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties. Learned counsel for the State, referring to paragraph no. 8 of the show-cause submits that the order of this Court has been complied. Patna High Court MJC No.4573 of 2024(6) dt.18-03-2026 3/3 4. Considering the aforesaid, it appears that opposite parties have complied the order of this Court. 5. In view of the above, the contempt application stands disposed of. Alok Verma/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U