Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1621 (PNJ)

RAJESH KHANDELWAL v. VIVEK JOSHI AND OTHERS

COCP/5029/2024 · 2026-04-28

Sudeepti Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-5029-2024 (O&M) -1- 295 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5029-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.04.2026 Rajesh Khandelwal ......Petitioner Vs. Sh. Vivek Joshi and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Kuldeep Khandelwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ram Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana, for respondents No.1 to 9 and 11 to 16. Mr. Nischal Chetanya manchanda, Advocate, for respondents No.10 and 17. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 10.12.2008 passed by this Court in CWP-16438-2006. 2. In compliance of the order dated 10.12.2008 passed by this Court in CWP-16438-2006, short reply-cum-compliance report by way of affidavit dated 29.01.2025 of Dr. Sapna Gahlawat, Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Hisar, along with Annexures R-1 and R-2, has been filed on behalf of respondent No.11 before the Registry. The same is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that order dated VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.02 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-5029-2024 (O&M) -2- 10.12.2008 passed by this Court in CWP-16438-2006 has been complied with. 4. In view of the above, since order dated 10.12.2008 passed by this Court in CWP-16438-2006, has been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 28.04.2026 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.02 12:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document