Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1589 (PAT)

BHOLA SINGH v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/3298/2024 · 2026-03-25

Satyavrat Verma

Criminal Appealbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3298 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2023 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. BHOLA SINGH S/O LATE BASUDEO SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAMBAN, BRAHM ASTHAN, P.S- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN. 2. BHAIRAV SINGH S/O LATE BASUDEO SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAMBAN, BRAHM ASTHAN, P.S- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN. 3. RAJU SINGH S/O LATE BASUDEO SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAMBAN, BRAHM ASTHAN, P.S- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN. 4. BALIRAM SINGH S/O LATE BASUDEO SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAMBAN, BRAHM ASTHAN, P.S- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN. 5. PATIRAM SINGH @ RAMPATI SINGH S/O LATE BASUDEO SINGH R/O VILLAGE- RAMBAN, BRAHM ASTHAN, P.S- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN. ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. RINA DEVI W/O RAJKUMAR PASWAN R/O VILLAGE- RAMBAN, BRAHM ASTHAN, P.S- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Radha Mohan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 25-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Special PP for the State, Mr. Sadanand Paswan. 2. The learned Special PP, at the outset, draws the attention of the Court to the order impugned dated 06.05.2024 and submits that from perusal of the order, it would manifest that the prosecution story, as recorded in the order impugned, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3298 of 2024(4) dt.25-03-2026 2/2 does not match with the allegation as alleged in the FIR. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants is not in a position to rebut the said submission of the learned Special PP for the State, as such, seeks permission to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty to the appellants to file a fresh anticipatory bail application before the learned District Court. 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T