IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 205 Seema Satpal and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) violation of order dated 01.5.2024 learned Judicial Magistrate 1 application filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in case CIS No.COMA/201/2021 titled as “Seema vs. Satpal and others” whereby the District Protection Officer, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri was directed to the house of the complainant in the day time at her (Protection Officer’s) convenience alongwith a lady police official to be deputed by SHO, Concerned Police Station to ensure about protection of complainant…..” COCP-5316-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.5316 of 2024 Date of decision : Versus Satpal and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. C.K. Jangra, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of order dated 01.5.2024 (Annexure P Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in an application filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in case CIS No.COMA/201/2021 titled as “Seema vs. Satpal and others” whereby the District Protection Officer, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri was directed to the house of the complainant in the day time at her (Protection er’s) convenience alongwith a lady police official to be deputed by SHO, Concerned Police Station to ensure about protection of complainant…..”. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5316 of 2024 (O & M) Date of decision :-30.04.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-12) passed by the Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri in an application filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in case CIS No.COMA/201/2021 titled as “Seema vs. Satpal and others” whereby the District Protection Officer, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri was directed to “…visit the house of the complainant in the day time at her (Protection er’s) convenience alongwith a lady police official to be deputed by SHO, Concerned Police Station to ensure about protection of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document submits that compromise has been effected between the has instructions to withdraw the present contempt petition. April 30, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-5316-2024 (O & M) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that compromise has been effected between the has instructions to withdraw the present contempt petition. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that compromise has been effected between the parties and he has instructions to withdraw the present contempt petition. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.30 18.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document