Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1587 (PNJ)

ASHISH MITTAL AND OTHERS v. RAKESH SHARMA AND OTHERS

XOBJC/660/1995 · 2026-04-22

Vikas Bahl

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-19473-CII-2024 IN/& XOBJC-660-1995 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *** CM-19473-CII-2024 IN/& XOBJC-660-1995 Date of decision : 22.04.2026 Ashish Mittal ... Appellant Versus Rakesh Sharma and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr.Deepak Suri, Advocate for the applicant/cross-objector. Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) CM-19473-CII-2024 1. This is an application under Order 41 Rule 19 read with Section 151 CPC for restoration of the cross objection which was dismissed for non- prosecution vide order dated 04.10.2024. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and the order dated 04.10.2024 is recalled and the cross-objection is ordered to be restored to its original number. DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.22 17:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment CM-19473-CII-2024 IN/& XOBJC-660-1995 2 XOBJC-660-1995 1. A perusal of the paper book would show that the claimant is not appearing in the matter and has even not sought for restoration of the appeal. 2. Learned counsel for the cross-objector, in view of the same, has submitted that the cross-objection be disposed of but liberty be granted to revive the cross-objection in case the claimant revives the main appeal. 3. In view of the above, the present cross-objection is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE April 22, 2026. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.22 17:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment