ASHISH MITTAL AND OTHERS v. RAKESH SHARMA AND OTHERS
XOBJC/660/1995 · 2026-04-22
Vikas Bahl
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1587 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1587 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CM-19473-CII-2024 IN/& XOBJC-660-1995 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***
CM-19473-CII-2024 IN/& XOBJC-660-1995
Date of decision : 22.04.2026
Ashish Mittal
... Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Sharma and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr.Deepak Suri, Advocate
for the applicant/cross-objector.
Mr.Gurcharan Dass, Advocate
for respondents no.1 and 2.
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
CM-19473-CII-2024
1.
This is an application under Order 41 Rule 19 read with Section 151 CPC for restoration of the cross objection which was dismissed for non- prosecution vide order dated 04.10.2024.
2.
For the reasons stated in the application which is supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and the order dated 04.10.2024 is recalled and the cross-objection is ordered to be restored to its original number.
DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.22 17:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment
CM-19473-CII-2024 IN/& XOBJC-660-1995 2
XOBJC-660-1995
1.
A perusal of the paper book would show that the claimant is not appearing in the matter and has even not sought for restoration of the appeal.
2.
Learned counsel for the cross-objector, in view of the same, has submitted that the cross-objection be disposed of but liberty be granted to revive the cross-objection in case the claimant revives the main appeal.
3.
In view of the above, the present cross-objection is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE April 22, 2026. Davinder Kumar
Whether speaking / reasoned
Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No DAVINDER KUMAR 2026.04.22 17:27 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order /
judgment