$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 542/2024, CM APPL. 48378/2024 & 61135/2024 GAUTAM BHATIA .....Appellant Through: None. versus SMT SUSHMA NANDA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Bajaj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 16.04.2026 1. None is present on behalf of the Appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that Appellant was tenant and Decree Order already stands executed against him and possession has already been taken, though the trial is still pending adjudication on mesne profits. 3. Since, none is present on behalf of the Appellant, the Appeal along with pending Applications is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. APRIL 16, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 15:24:42