CWP-11420-202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 MANOJ SHARMA STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Anterpreet Singh TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed directing the respondents to regularise the petitioners’ service consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner petitioners will be satisfied in case representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and period in view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Civil App no.14831 of 2024 titled particulars of the benefits will be mentioned therein. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate notice on behalf of representation is filed by same will be decided by 2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: MANOJ SHARMA AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Anterpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia directing the respondents to regularise the petitioners’ service consequential benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioner will be satisfied in case they are representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Civil App o.14831 of 2024 titled Jaggo v. Union of India particulars of the petitioners’ service which entitle them to the claimed benefits will be mentioned therein. Notice of motion. Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate on behalf of the respondents/State and representation is filed by the petitioners within four weeks from today, the same will be decided by respondent no.3/Director, Kalpana Chawla Medical IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11420-2026 Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 …Petitioner(s) …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA for the petitioners. inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the petitioners’ service along with all Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, the they are permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified view of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Union of India and others. All relevant ’ service which entitle them to the claimed Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, accepts and submits that in case any such the petitioners within four weeks from today, the Director, Kalpana Chawla Medical mandamus all submits that at this stage, the permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified eal . All relevant ’ service which entitle them to the claimed accepts submits that in case any such the petitioners within four weeks from today, the Director, Kalpana Chawla Medical Aman Dua 2026.04.20 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-11420-202 College, by passing a speaking order thereupon in taking into consideration the judgment in of receiving the representation. 5. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms 6. Ordered accordingly. 7. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of 17.04.2026 Ad 2026 -2- , by passing a speaking order thereupon in taking into consideration the judgment in Jaggo of receiving the representation. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable , by passing a speaking order thereupon in accordance with law by Jaggo case ibid., within six months In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No accordance with law by within six months petitioners In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2026.04.20 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document