Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 1548 (PNJ)

MANISH BANSAL v. ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER

CACP/26/2024 · 2026-04-17

Rohit Kapoor, To Be Nominated

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CACP-26-2024 (O&M) 1 206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CACP-26-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.04.2026 MANISH BANSAL ....Appellant Versus ANIL KUMAR AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR ***** Present: Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the appellant. Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate for respondent No.1. ***** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) 1. This contempt appeal arises out of the order passed by the learned Single Judge on 06.11.2024, wherein a prima facie case of disobedience was made out and direction was issued to the respondents in the writ petition to face contempt proceedings. 2. In our view, the observations made by the Contempt Court are prima facie in nature, and are intended to form the basis for framing of the charge. It is well settled that against such an order, no contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is maintainable. 3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed and is consigned to the record room as being not maintainable. The appellant would be at liberty to file reply MOHIT GOYAL 2026.04.23 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CACP-26-2024 (O&M) 2 and raise all legal and factual pleas by way of affidavit through their counsel before the Contempt Court. 4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) APRIL 17, 2026 JUDGE mohit goyal Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT GOYAL 2026.04.23 14:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document