Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./12848/2024 · 2026-03-16
Praveen Kumar
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1496 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1496 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12848 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2023 Thana- MAHINDWARA District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
1. Uma Shankar Rai @ Uma Shankar Prasad Yadav S/O Late Yogi Rai R/O VILLAGE- KHARHUA @ KHARHUAA, PS.- MAHINDWARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI.
2.
KAMOD KUMAR S/O UMA SHANKAR RAI R/O VILLAGE- KHARHUA @ KHARHUAA, PS.- MAHINDWARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI.
3.
SHASHI RANJAN KUMAR @ BRIJ MOHAN KUMAR @ BRAJ MOHAN KUMAR S/O UMA SHANKAR RAI R/O VILLAGE- KHARHUA @ KHARHUAA, PS.- MAHINDWARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI.
4.
ARVIND RAY S/O LATE YOGI RAY R/O VILLAGE- KHARHUA @ KHARHUAA, PS.- MAHINDWARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI.
5.
LAL BABU RAY @ LAL BABU PRASAD YADAV S/O LATE YOGI RAY R/O VILLAGE- KHARHUA @ KHARHUAA, PS.- MAHINDWARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI. ... ... Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Bihar BIHAR
2.
NAWAL KUMAR S/O LATE RAM SURAT RAI R/O VILLAGE- KHARHUA @ KHARHUAA, PS.- MAHINDWARA, DISTT.- SITAMARHI. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Rita Verma, APP For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 16-03-2026 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the available points to him as well as the grounds as mentioned in this application at the time of framing of the charge.
2. Permission is granted.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12848 of 2024(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/2
3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
Pawan/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T