BOORGULA MEHER THEJ MEHAR TEJ v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
W.P.(C)/14650/2024 · 2026-04-15
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Writ Petition (Civil)body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1488 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 1488 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14650/2024 and CM APPL. 61488/2024
BOORGULA MEHER THEJ MEHAR TEJ .....Petitioner Through: Mr Arjun Singh Bawa and Mr. Siddhartha, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel, Civil, GNCTD. Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advocate for R-UOI. Mr. Gaurav Dhama and Ms. Sushree Sipra, Advs. for R-2. Ms. Mamta, Mr. Rohan, Ms. Shruttima, Ms. Amishi, Ms. Aishwarya, Ms. Diya and Ms. Jahanvi, Advs. for R-5 Mr. Sahil, Advocate for R-7. Mr. Nirmal Mishra and Ms. Naisargika, Advocate for R-11. Mr. Ashish Verma, Mr. Akhil R., Advocates for R-8 Mr. Nital Hinduja, Advocate for R-
17.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R %
15.04.2026
1. Having heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, as of now, there does not seem to be any binding policy requiring the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 12:22:29
respondents to mask/ remove/ redact/ delist/ delete the name of the petitioner from the digital records of the case concerning the allegation from which the petitioner has been absolved. It be noted, however, that the petitioner has been acquitted.
2. In absence of any binding policy, the Court is unable to accede to the prayer made in the instant petition.
3. It is also pointed out that almost a similar dispute is pending for
consideration before the Supreme Court in Ikanoon Software Development Pvt. Ltd. v. Karthick Theodore.1
4. Needless to state that if after pronouncement of the judgment by the Supreme Court, the petitioner’s grievance is not fully mitigated, it shall be at liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid observations and liberty, the instant petition stands
disposed of.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 15, 2026 Nc
1 SLP No. 15311/2024. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 12:22:29